AiPlaygroundWM

In the middle of generating veriety version of the vampirella. parameters (full body:1.2) photo of Vampirella, solo focus, look at viewer, very long hair, micro bikini, muscular, curvy, (huge breasts:1.35), abs, narrow_waist, huge pelvic, (thick thighs:1.35), high_heels, boots, (dynamic pose, fighting stance:1.2), blood_puddle, partially submerged, body half-submerged, (full moon), forest, Blood everywhere, (best quality, realistic) <lora:VampirellaV2:0.4> v4mp1r3ll4, <lora:angel_wings_v10:0.6> (angel_wings) Negative prompt: (breasts out, nude:1.4), extra hand, extra foot, close up, (multiple view), missing finger, extra fingers, fused fingers, cropped, (crossed eyes, worst quality,bad quality:1.4),monochrome, greyscale, (text, signature, watermark:1.4), mutated Steps: 15, Sampler: DPM++ 2M, Schedule type: Karras, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 1489340367, Size: 512x640, Model hash: b89ba7f884, Model: meichidarkV38_pruned, Denoising strength: 0.55, Clip skip: 2, This one As you can se...

About 1 year ago I've tested denoising, and today test again.   New ram has arrived~ 8GB *2 ==> 32GB *2 upgrade! 15steps 512*640 (4:5 ratio) hires 2.5x Check Point model is :  AstrAnime 5b 0.4 0.5 0.55 0.6 Tiled diffusion extension off by mistake, but runs well!? Keep off and tested. [ The face all good because using AD(after detailer. faceand hands. denoising 0.55) ] 0.55 and 0.6 slightly different. and better than 0.4 certainly. Similar results. Change Check Point model : meichidark V3.8 ????? Same as before How about 0.7? ????Ok. Pretty mess up Remove 0.4 0.5 0.55 0.6 Denoising over 0.55 is better than I think. How about at steps 20 0.5 0.55  0.55 result's heels started wierd. How about with lora? 0.6 Ok definitely 0.6 is out. Conclusion : Denoising is under 0.55 Every image has exif info